Hi Acee, In general seems that for any BGP VPN (L2 or L3) you have an RD plus a list of RTs (which can be import, export or both) - so I’d prefer that to be defined in a shared grouping (more or less as per the structure Patrice gave below) than to force each model to redefine it.
Giles > On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:51, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Patrice – we are working fervently on a common IETF routing types model. > We have both route-target and router-distinguisher types defined there. The > work is being done in the Routing WG. Our intension is to accelerate > standardization so it doesn’t hold up standardization of the importing > modules. Please comment as to whether you think this meets BESS requirements. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00.txt> > > Thanks, > Acee > P.S. We plan an update next week but the RD and RT definitions have not > changed. > > > > From: BESS <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf > of "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 9:26 AM > To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, > Himanshu Shah <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module > > Folks, > > As part of EVPN, L2VPn and L3VPN Yang model, there is a “module” common to > all 3 Yang models. > > | +--rw bgp-parameters > | | +--rw common > | | +--rw rd-rt* [route-distinguisher] > | | +--rw route-distinguisher string > | | +--rw vpn-target* [rt-value] > | | +--rw rt-value string > | | +--rw rt-type bgp-rt-type > > > It will be interesting to create a common BGP parameter Yang module as shown > above. I think it just makes sense. > However, there is a minor challenge; that module require a home (a draft). > I’m looking for feedback about the best place/draft for such a module. > > Thanks for your help. > Regards, > Patrice Brissette > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
