Hi Giles, I will add the route-target-type type (enum of import, export, both) but for a general grouping, it appears there are some discrepancies between the 3 models. Assuming the types: route-discriminator, route-target, and route-target-type, can you provide a consensus grouping that all the models would use? Thanks, Acee
From: Giles Heron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 11:18 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Himanshu Shah <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module Hi Acee, In general seems that for any BGP VPN (L2 or L3) you have an RD plus a list of RTs (which can be import, export or both) - so I'd prefer that to be defined in a shared grouping (more or less as per the structure Patrice gave below) than to force each model to redefine it. Giles On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:51, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Patrice - we are working fervently on a common IETF routing types model. We have both route-target and router-distinguisher types defined there. The work is being done in the Routing WG. Our intension is to accelerate standardization so it doesn't hold up standardization of the importing modules. Please comment as to whether you think this meets BESS requirements. https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00.txt Thanks, Acee P.S. We plan an update next week but the RD and RT definitions have not changed. From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 9:26 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Himanshu Shah <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module Folks, As part of EVPN, L2VPn and L3VPN Yang model, there is a "module" common to all 3 Yang models. | +--rw bgp-parameters | | +--rw common | | +--rw rd-rt* [route-distinguisher] | | +--rw route-distinguisher string | | +--rw vpn-target* [rt-value] | | +--rw rt-value string | | +--rw rt-type bgp-rt-type It will be interesting to create a common BGP parameter Yang module as shown above. I think it just makes sense. However, there is a minor challenge; that module require a home (a draft). I'm looking for feedback about the best place/draft for such a module. Thanks for your help. Regards, Patrice Brissette _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
