Ok thanks From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 17:57 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track
On 1/16/2018 11:29 AM, Eric C Rosen wrote: "If the LIR-pF flag is set in a given PTA, the LIR flag of that PTA SHOULD also be set." [SLI] Why not using a MUST ? [Eric] If all the PEs support the LIR-pF flag, the procedures will work as intended even if the LIR flag is not set. So I don't think a MUST is appropriate. Thinking about this more, I now think you are right that MUST would be better. By saying MUST, we remove an unnecessary variation in behavior. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
