Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given the drawbacks this document mentions regarding the default DF election
algorithm defined in RFC7432, I also think it would be better for this document
to update RFC7432 so that implementers are aware that there are better
alternatives out there.

* Section 3.2:

Who actually advertises Type 0 in the DF Alg field given that the legacy
RFC7432 implementations do not use this extended community at all?


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to