Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Given the drawbacks this document mentions regarding the default DF election algorithm defined in RFC7432, I also think it would be better for this document to update RFC7432 so that implementers are aware that there are better alternatives out there. * Section 3.2: Who actually advertises Type 0 in the DF Alg field given that the legacy RFC7432 implementations do not use this extended community at all? _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
