Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- First one minor editorial comment: Sec 3.2 "Otherwise if even a single advertisement for the type-4 route is not received with the locally configured DF Alg and capability, the Default DF Election algorithm (modulus) algorithm MUST be used as in [RFC7432]." I believe you meant a single advertisement is received without the configured DF Alg and capability (or a different one I guess), and not that the advertisement is not received at all (because that might be hard to check), right? Maybe you can rephrase this sentence a bit to make the intention more clear! However, think about this further, I wondering if there is something here that such be discussed in the security considerations, e.g. how easy would it be for an attacker to disturb the algo selection and cause a fallback to the default scheme...? _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
