In-line Good idea agreed that’s a good way to go using uSID along with SR-MPLS.
I am going to set that up in my lab all 3 in parallel overlays SR-MPLS, uSID and SRv6. That may not be a bad idea having the architecture in parallel I wonder and using SRv6 when you don’t have MTU constraints use Ti-LFA and for longer SID lengths paths use SR-MPLS in the same topology. I believe the interoperability draft that was sent earlier on talks about building both SRv6 v6 data plane and SR-MPLS ipv4 data plane in parallel using uSID. Gyan Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 7, 2019, at 6:19 AM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you need uSIDs for MTU control or restrictions on the depth that you can > parse in the packet, you should also consider regular MPLS-SR, or in an IP > only network draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip (RFC editor's queue). > > - Stewart > > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
