7432 makes the clear distinction between broadcast domain and bridge table (in definitions section no less...) Concur, this erratum 5899 should be rejected.
Erratum 5900 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5900> makes somewhat more sense, VLAN Bundle in 7432 6.2 is for multiple broadcast domains, so switching "VLAN Bundle services" to "multiple BDs" makes sense. Minor nit. ..:|:.:|:. Luc André Burdet | Cisco Systems Canada Inc. email: [email protected] | phone: +1 613 254 4814 On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:30 AM John E Drake <jdrake= [email protected]> wrote: > I agree > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Nov 12, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I don't understand why this erratum was filed. > > "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN > documents. > > It should be rejected. > > > > Thanks. > > Jorge > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > > Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 4:17 PM > > To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Nagaraj, > Kiran (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>, "Sathappan, > Senthil (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]>, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" < > [email protected]>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899) > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8584, > > "Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder Election > Extensibility". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5899__;!8WoA6RjC81c!SaIWS8sh_Qv0z3EeiwJR318oBQoGXbgX9muwUkuY33c6bBXZItc9S87ssaGNDd4$ > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Sean.Chen <[email protected]> > > > > Section: 1.1 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > BD: Broadcast Domain. An EVI may be comprised of one BD > > (VLAN-based or VLAN Bundle services) or multiple BDs (VLAN-aware > > Bundle services). > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > BD: Bridge Domain. An EVI may be comprised of one BD > > (VLAN-based or VLAN Bundle services) or multiple BDs (VLAN-aware > > Bundle services). > > > > Notes > > ----- > > broadcast domain is not comprised in any services (VLAN-based or VLAN > Bundle service). > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC8584 (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-09) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder > Election Extensibility > > Publication Date : April 2019 > > Author(s) : J. Rabadan, Ed., S. Mohanty, Ed., A. Sajassi, > J. Drake, K. Nagaraj, S. Sathappan > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : BGP Enabled Services > > Area : Routing > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
