That’s not correct. The service in question assumes that there are multiple VLANs but that a given MAC address is unique across all of them. Hence, one broadcast domain.
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 12, 2019, at 9:16 PM, Luc André Burdet <[email protected]> wrote: 7432 makes the clear distinction between broadcast domain and bridge table (in definitions section no less...) Concur, this erratum 5899 should be rejected. Erratum 5900<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5900__;!8WoA6RjC81c!UGrmlwynsVF22uakunYYqBVrii_3PWz4Q43L2WbuaSCoKttHoPEA3FhjNypHO7k$> makes somewhat more sense, VLAN Bundle in 7432 6.2 is for multiple broadcast domains, so switching "VLAN Bundle services" to "multiple BDs" makes sense. Nit. .:|:.:|:. Luc André Burdet | Cisco Systems Canada Inc. email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | phone: +1 613 254 4814 On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:30 AM John E Drake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I agree Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't understand why this erratum was filed. > "Broadcast Domain" is the correct term used in RFC7432 and all the EVPN > documents. > It should be rejected. > > Thanks. > Jorge > > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 4:17 PM > To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Nagaraj, Kiran (Nokia - > US/Mountain View)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "Sathappan, Senthil (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Vigoureux, Martin > (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Bocci, > Matthew (Nokia - GB)" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5899) > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8584, > "Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5899__;!8WoA6RjC81c!SaIWS8sh_Qv0z3EeiwJR318oBQoGXbgX9muwUkuY33c6bBXZItc9S87ssaGNDd4$ > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Sean.Chen > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > Section: 1.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > BD: Broadcast Domain. An EVI may be comprised of one BD > (VLAN-based or VLAN Bundle services) or multiple BDs (VLAN-aware > Bundle services). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > BD: Bridge Domain. An EVI may be comprised of one BD > (VLAN-based or VLAN Bundle services) or multiple BDs (VLAN-aware > Bundle services). > > Notes > ----- > broadcast domain is not comprised in any services (VLAN-based or VLAN > Bundle service). > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8584 (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-09) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder > Election Extensibility > Publication Date : April 2019 > Author(s) : J. Rabadan, Ed., S. Mohanty, Ed., A. Sajassi, J. > Drake, K. Nagaraj, S. Sathappan > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : BGP Enabled Services > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!8WoA6RjC81c!UGrmlwynsVF22uakunYYqBVrii_3PWz4Q43L2WbuaSCoKttHoPEA3FhjirmvnDo$>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
