On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Gyan Mishra wrote:

<trimmed>

|     Gyan> Source discovery is only necessary with ASM not SSM. With SSM the 
receiver is "source" aware so does not require any discovery mechanism.  
| So with SSM which requires IGMPv3 enabled on the receiver last hop router 
subnets and on the source first hop router subnet for the both to be "source 
aware" ; for the receiver now to
| send the (S,G) join for the channel since it is now source aware. How the 
receiver gets that source awareness is from the server URI that the user 
connects to which has the S,G
| information ; server has to be also  source aware and has S,G channel 
available that can be joined. With IGMPv3 the packet  accommodate the Source 
information in the S,G join sent
| along the RPF path to the source. You mention that SSM deployment has been 
limited but in fact the opposite and reason why ASM is being officially 
deprecated by the IETF for inter
| domain multicast routing. IPv6 does not even have MSDP support since with ASM 
MSDP source discovery and propagation is not necessary since no RPs exist all 
disparate ASM multicast
| domains can now be collapsed into a single SSM domain. ASM MSDP/Anycast has 
its complexities which is why IPv6 nixed the idea of integrating MSDP into the 
architecture. Thus IPv6 only
| supports SSM for inter-domain multicast routing. I would keep the comment 
about ASM complexity which is true but remove mention of SSM.  I would not 
mention any gains with less state

Actually, Embedded RP provides interdomain ASM for IPv6 and is the reason 
there is no need for MSDP in IPv6.

No one would disagree that SSM is simpler and the ideal way to go, hence 
draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm recommends SSM-only for 
interdomain deployments.  Unfortunately, for various (and sometimes 
somewhat valid) reasons, ASM lives on, at least in intradomain 
deployments.  Hence, BGP would still need to cover ASM scenarios, at 
least for these intradomain deployments that still rely on ASM to work.

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to