Hello,
I have two comments regarding section 4.2 Comment 1: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04: “ES-Import RT community inherits from ESI only byte 1-7,” As per RFC 7432, ES-Import RT community inherits from ESI only 6 (not 7, as in draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04) octets from ESI Comment 2: What is the benefit of restricting Modulo calculation to 5 octets only (draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 specifies here octets 3-7), instead of taking all 9 (or even all 10) octets into account. For example, for HRW, RFC 8584 already describes computing a 32 bit CRC over the concatenation of Ethernet Tag and ESI, so *all 10* ESI octets are used for better entropy. What is the benefit of restricting here for only subset of ESI octets? Thanks, Krzysztof > On 2020 -Jan-21, at 17:58, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Support – though I’ve always thought MC-LAG was a hack, it is part of the > landscape. > Thanks, > Acee > > From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf > of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bo...@nokia.com > <mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>> > Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM > To: "bess@ietf.org <mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org > <mailto:bess@ietf.org>> > Cc: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org>" > <draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org>>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org > <mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>" <bess-cha...@ietf.org > <mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>> > Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 > > Hello, > > This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 [1] . > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this > Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't > progress without answers from all the authors and contributors. > > Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document. > > If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > This poll for adoption closes on Tuesday 4th February 2020. > > Regards, > Matthew and Stephane > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa/> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org <mailto:BESS@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
