Support, Same question on comment #1
Cheers, Jeff On Jan 21, 2020, 9:19 AM -0800, Krzysztof Grzegorz Szarkowicz <kszarkow...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hello, > > > I have two comments regarding section 4.2 > > > Comment 1: > > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04: “ES-Import RT community inherits from ESI > only byte 1-7,” > > As per RFC 7432, ES-Import RT community inherits from ESI only 6 (not 7, as > in draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04) octets from ESI > > > Comment 2: > > What is the benefit of restricting Modulo calculation to 5 octets only > (draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 specifies here octets 3-7), instead of > taking all 9 (or even all 10) octets into account. For example, for HRW, RFC > 8584 already describes computing a 32 bit CRC over the concatenation of > Ethernet Tag and ESI, so *all 10* ESI octets are used for better entropy. > What is the benefit of restricting here for only subset of ESI octets? > > > > Thanks, > Krzysztof > > > > On 2020 -Jan-21, at 17:58, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > Support – though I’ve always thought MC-LAG was a hack, it is part of the > > landscape. > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - > > GB)" <matthew.bo...@nokia.com> > > Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM > > To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> > > Cc: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org" > > <draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" > > <bess-cha...@ietf.org> > > Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for > > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 > > > > Hello, > > > > This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for > > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 [1] . > > > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group > > list. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > > If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please > > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > > relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't > > progress without answers from all the authors and contributors. > > > > Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document. > > > > If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly > > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > > conformance with IETF rules. > > > > This poll for adoption closes on Tuesday 4th February 2020. > > > > Regards, > > Matthew and Stephane > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BESS mailing list > > BESS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
