Hi Matt, 

Sorry, did I miss this before?

I am not aware of any IPR that needs to be disclosed and has not already been 
disclosed for this document.

 

Of course (?) I support progressing this work which I think is a simple 
addition to enable quite a lot of function. I still regret that we used the 
“datacentre-gateway” file name as the document is about SR-enabled domains as 
indicated in the Title and Abstract.

 

Looking back at my email trail, there was a final point of discussion with 
Stephane that I am not sure was completely resolved: Stephane?

 

Also, since -04 expired, would you like me to post a keep-alive -05?

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com> 
Sent: 26 February 2020 11:29
To: draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: REMINDER Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04

 

WG

 

I have only seen one IPR responses to this WG last call and no comments. I will 
therefore extend it for another two weeks.

 

Regards

 

Matthew

 

From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" 
<matthew.bo...@nokia.com>
Date: Monday, 10 February 2020 at 16:17
To: "draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org" 
<draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04

 


This email starts a two-week working group last call for 
draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04


Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.

 

This poll runs until Monday 24th February 2020.

 

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please respond 
to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant 
undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the 
Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.  

We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate 
if you are aware of any implementations of the modified protocol described in 
this draft.

 Thank you,

Matthew

 

[1]  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw> 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

 

 

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to