Re: [bess] REMINDER Re: WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04

Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:35:26 -0700 

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document.

On 3/11/20 5:23 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:


Hi Matthew, WG,

I just posted -05
That is chiefly a keep-alive refresh, but I also updated the IANA section and uses to take account of the FCFS allocation of a code point for the document.
We still have an open discussion on a minor point with Stephane – I propose we roll that into the last call. 

Wrt IPR

  * Eric Rosen
    We may be able to rouse him from his retirement slumber, but
    perhaps not.
    I have a memory of Eric sending a cover-all email about Auth-48
    and IPR, but:
    - I may be imagining that
    - I certainly can’t find it
  * Keyur Patel
    We will prod him!

Best,

Adrian

*From:*Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>
*Sent:* 10 March 2020 11:35
*To:* adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: REMINDER Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04 

Hi Adrian
Thanks for the response. Yes, please could you refresh the draft to keep it alive.
I’ve only received IPR responses from you, Luay and John. Please could you chase your other co-authors to respond as well.
I also didn’t see any other comments on the list. I suggest we put this document back in the WG LC queue so we can iron out any final discussion points before running another last call. It would probably make sense to inform the spring WG as well since this is really about interconnecting SR-enabled domains. 

Cheers

Matthew

*From: *Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>
*Organisation: *Old Dog Consulting
*Reply to: *"adr...@olddog.co.uk" <adr...@olddog.co.uk>
*Date: *Monday, 9 March 2020 at 13:00
*To: *"Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> *Subject: *RE: REMINDER Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04 

Hi Matt,

Sorry, did I miss this before?
I am not aware of any IPR that needs to be disclosed and has not already been disclosed for this document.
Of course (?) I support progressing this work which I think is a simple addition to enable quite a lot of function. I still regret that we used the “datacentre-gateway” file name as the document is about SR-enabled domains as indicated in the Title and Abstract.
Looking back at my email trail, there was a final point of discussion with Stephane that I am not sure was completely resolved: Stephane? 

Also, since -04 expired, would you like me to post a keep-alive -05?

Thanks,

Adrian

*From:*Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>
*Sent:* 26 February 2020 11:29
*To:* draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
*Subject:* REMINDER Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04 

WG
I have only seen one IPR responses to this WG last call and no comments. I will therefore extend it for another two weeks. 

Regards

Matthew
*From: *BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bo...@nokia.com> 
*Date: *Monday, 10 February 2020 at 16:17
*To: *"draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gate...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> *Subject: *[bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04 


  This email starts a two-week working group last call for
  draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-04
Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. 

This poll runs until Monday 24^th February 2020.
We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. 

There is currently no IPR disclosed.
We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [1]. Please indicate if you are aware of any implementations of the modified protocol described in this draft. 

 Thank you,

Matthew

[1]https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to