Hi Authors,

 

Please fix these comments as part of the draft refresh. The draft is expired
now. We need a new version before proceeding.

 

Thanks,

 

 

From: Luc André Burdet <[email protected]> 
Sent: mardi 15 septembre 2020 20:32
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-06 - review

 

Hi Authors,

 

I have completed a review of -05 and -06.

A lot of the feedback has been incorporated, especially in the -05
significant update. I appreciate the thoroughness, thank you.

 

Please fine below a few final comments based on -06.

These are non-blocking comments seeking clarifications or minor corrections,
and in my view the document is complete and ready to progress.

 

*       There is a new Informative Ref on
draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-00.txt ; I presume this will not
slow down this draft.

 

*       IANA pre-allocation section still requests EC 0x7 (which has been
removed from draft). Can IANA request also be removed/released ?

 

*       Section 5.4 last sentence: s/MAC route/BMAC route/ of the port for
PBB-?

 

*       Section 5.5, bullet 3  should not read “withdraw the previously
advertised MAC”-- but refer to the fact that this “MAC” is really just a
colouring EC of the aggregation route and intent is actually to “withdraw
the previously advertised Type-3 vESI route (ES/EAD for EVPN, or BMAC for
PBB-EVPN)”

 

Nits:

*       Please use &nbhy; to prevent PBB-EVPN breaking on the hyphen (s 3.7
esp.)
*       Last para s. 5: s/baesd/based
*       s. 5.4  s/each vES MAY be color with/colored/

 

Regards,

Luc André

 

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>   |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to