Yes，Support its adoption. I think this draft gives the operator confidences to deploy pure IPv6 transport network in coming days.
Some comments for the drafts are below: 1. Should the test scenarios, test items and test results be described in more detail in the body of this draft? 2. I think such guidelines can also be used within the operator’s network domain(PE-RR, or PE-PE), not only the emphasized PE-CE edge. 3. Is it necessary for the section 4? I think changing that content to describe some guidelines for how to using the RFC 8950 may be more beneficial? Some Nits: 1. Section 8 Security Considerations: “The extensions defined in this document allow BGP to propagate reachability information about IPv6 routes over an MPLS IPv4 core network.” Should it be: “The extensions defined in this document allow BGP to propagate reachability information about IPv4 routes over an IPv6 core network.” 2. Section 6 “Operational Consideration” said “Both IPv4 and IPv6 peer now exists under the IPv6 address family configuration.” Should it be “Both IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes reachable information now exists under the IPv6 address family configuration.” 3. A.1 Router and Switch Vendors Support and Quality Assurance: GUI----》GUA Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 5:37 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-03 Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-03 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document will not progress without answers from all of the authors and contributors. Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document. If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. This poll for adoption closes on April 27th 2021. Regards, Matthew and Stephane [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh/
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
