Hi Satya

I read the draft and have a few questions.

IPv4 does not support per flow per packet load balancing as all packets
belonging to the same flow must hash to the same path to prevent out of
order packets and thus is subject to polarization of flows as high
bandwidth flows may hash to the same path and low bandwidth flows as well
to the same path resulting in very uneven load balancing.  Do to this issue
it does not make either iBGP or eBGP can really benefit from link bandwidth
extended community weight based load sharing.

IPV6 flow label RFC 6437 stateless locally significant 5-tuple header hash
generated 20 byte key input to hash function results in uniform 50/50 load
balancing over EGP or IGP ECMP paths.

I think it maybe a good idea to reference the IPv4 polarization issue with
flow based load balancing and that only with IPv6 flow label can true 50/50
uniform load balancing be achieved.

I noticed that the normative draft referenced was adopted but has not
progressed.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth/

Has the draft been implemented by Cisco or any other vendors ?

Kind Regards

Gyan


On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:38 AM Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) <satyamoh=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> On behalf of all the authors, we request a discussion of the draft
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03  and
> subsequent WG adoption.
>
> This draft extends the usage of the DMZ link bandwidth to scenarios where
> the cumulative link bandwidth needs to be advertised to a BGP speaker.
>
> Additionally, there is provision to send the link bandwidth extended
> community to EBGP speakers via configurable knobs. Please refer to section
> 3 and 4 for the use cases.
>
>
>
> This feature has multiple-vendor implementations and has been deployed by
> several customers in their networks.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --Satya
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [email protected] <[email protected]>*



*M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to