Hi WG,

 

Just as a reminder, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery currently proposes
two options: 1) use time synchronization, 2) Use handshake.

 

We have issues moving forward the draft because of some controversy on the
handshake option while the time sync option seems to have implementations.

 

It seems that the authors/co-authors agreed to progress the document by
removing the handshake option, leaving the "time sync" as the core of the
document.

 

As the document is a WG document, we (chairs) need to confirm that there is
no objection from the WG progressing the document in such a way.

 

Please provide your feedback.

 

We are opening a poll starting today and ending on **** 18th June **** to
gather feedbacks.

 

Thanks,

 

Stephane

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery/

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to