Hi WG,

 

We have received any objection and have seen some support for dropping the 
handshake options for the current draft.

Thus, the WG is fine with the proposed change.

 

Authors,

 

Please proceed with the removal and progress the draft to closure.

 

Thanks,

 

Stephane

 

 

From: BESS <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > on behalf of 
Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 12:45
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >, BESS <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [bess] WG POLL: Moving forward 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery by dropping "Handshake" option

 

My only concern with the time sync approach is that it imposes the requirement 
for some kind of time sync protocol (either ntp or ptp).  >From what I 
understand, running these in the data center is not that common.

 

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:19 AM <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi WG,

 

Just as a reminder, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery currently proposes 
two options: 1) use time synchronization, 2) Use handshake.

 

We have issues moving forward the draft because of some controversy on the 
handshake option while the time sync option seems to have implementations.

 

It seems that the authors/co-authors agreed to progress the document by 
removing the handshake option, leaving the “time sync” as the core of the 
document.

 

As the document is a WG document, we (chairs) need to confirm that there is no 
objection from the WG progressing the document in such a way.

 

Please provide your feedback.

 

We are opening a poll starting today and ending on **** 18th June **** to 
gather feedbacks.

 

Thanks,

 

Stephane

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery/

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to