Hi Loa, Thank you very much for your review. We went through the document and tried to expand as many abbreviations as possible. Also we improved the terminology section trying to help non-multicast experts.
Please check out rev 06, which addresses all your comments. Thanks! Jorge From: Loa Andersson via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Friday, May 19, 2023 at 1:35 AM To: rtg-...@ietf.org <rtg-...@ietf.org> Cc: bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source....@ietf.org> Subject: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source-05 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Reviewer: Loa Andersson Review result: Has Issues There are a lot of Abbreviations unecpanded, starting with EVPN in the abstract, that are not well-know abbreviations according to the RFC Editors list at https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt The suggestion is that the authors go over the document, look at every abbreviation and make sure that they are properly expanded. AS foir something that is wellknow in the multicast community, (S,G), (*,G), "S", "G" etc. it would be good with a reference for us outsiders. Otther than that, and that I sometimes find the language a bit "flowery", that makes the draft slow to read (and yes I admit that I am not a subject matter expert). Other than that I think the draft from a technical point of view is wellwritten, and can be progressed as soon as the nits are fixed. /Loa
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
