Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Be ye not afraid - this DISCUSS should be easy to address. Please see https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for some information on DISCUSS ballots.... Like Paul Wouters I find Section 9 ("Intellectual Property Considerations") troubling, but I'm sufficiently troubled that I feel it deserves a DISCUSS. I *think* that what the text says is compatible with what is in BCP79 / the copyright boilerplate, but: 1: IANAL and 2: if it's exactly the same, why is this section here? If it *not* the same, then I think that this requires some discussions with the IETF Trust / lawyers / etc... I strongly suggest removing it, or, if it is needed for some sort of corporate / legal reason that it be justified / explained. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much for writing this document. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
