Hi Warren, Paul, 

I just submit a v11 version removing that section.
I was quite surprise as you were about this section. It seems like it came from 
an old template.

Regards, 
Patrice Brissette 
Distinguished Engineer 
Cisco Systems 





On 2023-07-05, 13:38, "Warren Kumari via Datatracker" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-10: Discuss


When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)




Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
<https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/> 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.




The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/ 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/>






----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Be ye not afraid - this DISCUSS should be easy to address.
Please see
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
<https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/>
for some information on DISCUSS ballots....


Like Paul Wouters I find Section 9 ("Intellectual Property Considerations")
troubling, but I'm sufficiently troubled that I feel it deserves a DISCUSS. I
*think* that what the text says is compatible with what is in BCP79 / the
copyright boilerplate, but: 1: IANAL and 2: if it's exactly the same, why is
this section here?


If it *not* the same, then I think that this requires some discussions with the
IETF Trust / lawyers / etc...


I strongly suggest removing it, or, if it is needed for some sort of corporate
/ legal reason that it be justified / explained.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thank you very much for writing this document.









_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to