Hi Martin, Elaborating a bit further to ensure there is no ambiguity …
(S1.2) "In some cases, this aggregation of PWs that share the same LSP pair may not be possible. For instance, if PW3 were terminated into a third PE, e.g. PE3, instead of PE1, the vES would need to be defined on a per individual PW on each PE, i.e. PW3 and PW5 would belong to ES-1, whereas PW4 and PW6 would be associated to ES-2." <PATRICE> Indeed..corrected. "defined on a per individual PW on each PE" is grammatically incorrect, but I think you mean that each PW gets its own vES. But that would mean that you need four ESs, not two. <PATRICE> Not really since PW share common LSP. Ali> A vES can consist of a group of PWs or group of LSPs (spread across two more PEs). In figure-2, the vES consists of two LSPs (LSP1 and LSP2) each with two PW2 (for a total of 4 PWs) spread across PE1 and PE2. The new text clarifies this. (S2) Please add EVI and Ethernet A-D to the glossary <PATRICE> Done
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
