Hi Ketan If we can do a quick implementation poll for the changes proposed in the draft, that would help.
Thanks Matthew From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 15:02 To: bess-cha...@ietf.org <bess-cha...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org <draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org>, BESS <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Request for an expedited WG adoption call for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hello Chairs, The authors would like to drop this gentle reminder of our request for an expedited WG adoption call for this draft that we had presented at IETF116. The draft is in essence an "errata" for a certain portion our BESS WG RFC9252. The concerned portions of the specification have been in development at various vendors for quite some time now. Interop issues were identified and these clarifications are needed for smooth interop and deployments that are ongoing. Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello All, We had presented https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args/ at the IETF 116. The slides are available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/slides-116-bess-draft-trr-bess-srv6-args-00.pdf Since this draft aims to fix some issues in the RFC9252 that was published by BESS WG, we had sought feedback/review from the WG and requested the WG chairs for an expedited WG adoption. We also wanted to check if any follow-up was required for the comments that were discussed at the meeting. Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
