+1 Cisco (IOS-XR) also has an implementation of this.
Thanks, Ketan On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 11:16 AM Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Nokia has an implementation of draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args in SROS. > > > > As Ketan says, it is important to make this work WG adopted as soon as > possible so that new implementors become aware of the changes compared to > RFC9252. > > > > Thanks, > > Jorge > > > > *From: *Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:25 AM > *To: *Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]>, [email protected] < > [email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] < > [email protected]>, BESS <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Request for an expedited WG adoption call for > draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args > > Hi Ketan > > > > If we can do a quick implementation poll for the changes proposed in the > draft, that would help. > > > > Thanks > > > > Matthew > > > > *From: *Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, 27 July 2023 at 15:02 > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] < > [email protected]>, BESS <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Request for an expedited WG adoption call for > draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args > > > > *CAUTION:* This is an external email. Please be very careful when > clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for > additional information. > > > > Hello Chairs, > > > > The authors would like to drop this gentle reminder of our request for an > expedited WG adoption call for this draft that we had presented at IETF116. > > > > The draft is in essence an "errata" for a certain portion our BESS WG > RFC9252. The concerned portions of the specification have been in > development at various vendors for quite some time now. Interop issues were > identified and these clarifications are needed for smooth interop and > deployments that are ongoing. > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > We had presented > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args/ at the > IETF 116. > > > > The slides are available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/slides-116-bess-draft-trr-bess-srv6-args-00.pdf > > > > Since this draft aims to fix some issues in the RFC9252 that was > published by BESS WG, we had sought feedback/review from the WG and > requested the WG chairs for an expedited WG adoption. > > > > We also wanted to check if any follow-up was required for the comments > that were discussed at the meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) > > > >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
