Hi, Jeff and Robert: Regarding to the name of "Sequence" field, I think we can modify it later to "EntryID", which may be more accurate. And, to Jeff's questions, what's the "two modes" refer to in your question?
Aijun -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2026 6:11 AM To: Wei Wang <[email protected]> Cc: idr <[email protected]>; Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>; BESS <[email protected]>; Sue Hares <[email protected]>; Keyur Patel <[email protected]> Subject: [Idr] Re: [bess] Re: Re: Re: Re: draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-25 - 1 Week WGLC onchanges (1/29/2026 to 1/5/2026) Wei, > On Feb 25, 2026, at 04:19, Wei Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we can add the following sentence in Section 5.2 to clarify that if > there no VPN Prefix ORF entry on the device, all VPN routes are permit to be > sent: > “The default entry for the VPN Prefix ORF type is "Permit All", which means > that all routes that do not match the existing entries in the VPN Prefix ORF > table shall be advertised.” > > We will update the description of receiver and RR/ASBR according to Jeffrey's > comment. > > Furthermore, I suggest keeping 'Sequence' as it can serve as an identifier > for operations such as deletion and update of VPN Prefix ORF entries. I'd suggest waiting on changes until the question I asked is answered. It impacts the suggestions for the updated text. What's the difference between the two modes? -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
