There is actually no remote side git running on that readonly git 
repos.  It is merely a symlink of the real folder that serves the
ssh repo. No specific commit hooks or apache modules have been
involved.  I suspect it is an apache cache problem because if
apache server was re-started, then it became current.

I guess you can either get the zipball/tarball or get the access
to the ssh repo for the latest soruce.

@Chris, may be we should remove the readonly git if it cannot be
fixed.

Пт, 22 фев 2013, Martin Neitzel писал(а):
> Hi Bill,
> 
> I followed the directions from:
> 
>       http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Qt%20IDE
> 
>       Source
>       [...browse, tar, zip]   You can clone the git repository with:
>       git clone http://www.jsoftware.com/qtide.git
> 
> I assumed that there only is one git repo and that this is the latest
> and greatest.   I had cloned on Feb 20th, shortly after midnight, yielding:
> 
>       qtide 28 > git log -1
>       commit 7091176c7a65bf900bf7d105891e5d265c80ac20
>       Author: cdb <[email protected]>
>       Date:   Thu Jan 10 17:19:07 2013 +0800
> 
>           use absolute path
>       qtide 29 >
> 
> Later (at around 4am), while revising all old beta-mails, I stumbled
> over David Mitchell's bug report from Jan 8 which I could confirm.
> But also a follow-up that this would already have been fixed "in
> the Windows compilation branch".  So I checked...
> 
>       qtide 32 > git branch -r
>         origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>         origin/master
>       qtide 33 >
> 
> ... no such branch in the git repo.  Next I waisted quite some time
> on the wiki, and finally found the branch in the gitlist-browsable
> version of, huh, perhaps *NOT* the clonable repo?  Are they different
> git repositories?
> 
> > the git server does not use email patch,
> 
> I know.  Email patches have to reviewed and if OK applied by hand
> (easily done with git-am).
> 
> > you can ask Chris for a write access to ssh protocol.
> 
> I wouldn't so say no.  (I'm not so much interested in have write
> access, but I *am* interested by having access to the correct
> repository containing the current/tar/zip version.)
> 
> > Send emails related to jqt development to [email protected].
> 
> I will do so.
> 
> > Look like QT_OPENGL was not defined when compiling the lib/wd/pane.cpp,
> > or there may not be a pane.cpp at all.
> 
> Nope, no pane.cpp at all.  (And, as we all know, "no pane, no gain!")
> 
> > Can you confirm you got the latest source?
> 
> Doesn't look like it.
> 
> > The read-only git repo might be faulty.
> 
> Well, it is at least certainly not current.  (Perhaps you just forgot to
> push/pull/send/receive-pack?)
> 
>                                                               Martin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to