I expect them to agree. Is this how table should look?
(i.3) +/ 0 0 1 2 (i.3) +/1 1 2 3 (i.3) +/1 2 1 2 2 3 3 4 (i.3) + table 0 --T------┐ │+│0 │ +-+------+ │0│ 0 1 2│ │1│ │ │2│ │ L-+------- (i.3) + table 1 --T------┐ │+│1 │ +-+------+ │0│ 1 2 3│ │1│ │ │2│ │ L-+------- (i.3) + table 1 2 --T---┐ │+│1 2│ +-+---+ │0│1 2│ │1│2 3│ │2│3 4│ L-+---- Linda ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
