This is the table that is in the list of words in locale z.  It seems to be
that it needs to be corrected there as it gives incorrect results that my
modivied table verbs are  incorrect in the same ways.

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Day
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] tab;e vs /

(I hope this displays alright,  but Thunderbird or
something will probably chuck in some line-throws)

Consider
    (i.3) + table ,0
+-+-+
|+|0|
+-+-+
|0|0|
|1|1|
|2|2|
+-+-+
    (i.3) + table 1 2
+-+---+
|+|1 2|
+-+---+
|0|1 2|
|1|2 3|
|2|3 4|
+-+---+
   and
    0 + table i.3
+-+----------+
|+|0         |
+-+----------+
|0| 1 2 0 1 2|
+-+----------+
    (,0) + table i.3
+-+-----+
|+|0 1 2|
+-+-----+
|0|0 1 2|
+-+-----+

These demonstrate that table requires vector arguments.

This can force them to be so:
    0 (+ table)&, i.3
+-+-----+
|+|0 1 2|
+-+-----+
|0|0 1 2|
+-+-----+
    0 (+ table)&,~ i.3
+-+-+
|+|0|
+-+-+
|0|0|
|1|1|
|2|2|
+-+-+

I wondered if I was correct in saying "vector",  but I
think this shows they should be;  if, for example, we
have a matrix argument,  the results are not too
helpful:-
    (i.3) (+ table)i.2 2
+-+---+
|+|0 1|
| |2 3|
+-+---+
|0|0 1|
|1|2 3|
|2|   |
| |1 2|
| |3 4|
| |   |
| |2 3|
| |4 5|
+-+---+
    (i.3) (+ table)~i.2 2
+---+-----+
|+  |0 1 2|
|   |0 0 0|
+---+-----+
|0 1|0 1 2|
|2 3|1 2 3|
|   |     |
|   |2 3 4|
|   |3 4 5|
+---+-----+
  whereas
    (i.3) (+ table)&, i.2 3
+-+-----------+
|+|0 1 2 3 4 5|
+-+-----------+
|0|0 1 2 3 4 5|
|1|1 2 3 4 5 6|
|2|2 3 4 5 6 7|
+-+-----------+

Any help?

Mike

On 09/10/2014 06:29, Linda Alvord wrote:
> Try this instead:
>
> (i.3) +/ 0
> (i.3) +/1
> (i.3) +/1 2
> (i.3) + table 0
> (i.3) + table 1
> (i.3) + table 1 2
>
>
> Linda
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Jbeta] tab;e vs /
>
> I expect them to agree.  Is this how table should look?
>
>   
>
> (i.3) +/ 0
>
> 0 1 2
>
>     
>
>     (i.3) +/1
>
> 1 2 3
>
>     
>
>     (i.3) +/1 2
>
> 1 2
> 2 3
> 3 4
>
>     
>
>     (i.3) + table 0
>
> --T------┐
> │+│0     │
> +-+------+
> │0│ 0 1 2│
> │1│      │
> │2│      │
> L-+-------
>
>     
>
>     (i.3) + table 1
>
> --T------┐
> │+│1     │
> +-+------+
> │0│ 1 2 3│
> │1│      │
> │2│      │
> L-+-------
>
>     
>
>     (i.3) + table 1 2
>
> --T---┐
> │+│1 2│
> +-+---+
> │0│1 2│
> │1│2 3│
> │2│3 4│
> L-+----
>
>     
>
>     
>
> Linda
>
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8347 - Release Date: 10/08/14

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to