If try. temporarily turns off debugging, shouldn't that be documented?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:30 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The failing code isn't in a try. statement. It's in a different definition.
>
> try. turns off debugging unless you have a catchd. control word. Maybe
> that would be called for here?
>
> Henry Rich
>
>
>
> On 1/12/2022 12:01 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > When I run the attached (in a script)
> >
> > ex=: {{1+y}}
> > exa=: {{try.ex y catch.end.}}
> > 13!:0]1
> > 13!:3'ex 0'
> >
> >     exa 4
> > 5
> >     ex 3
> > |stop: ex
> > |   1+y
> > |ex[0]
> >
> >        JVERSION
> > Engine: j903/j64/darwin
> > Release-a: commercial/2021-12-16T15:16:37
> > Library: 9.03.08
> > Qt IDE: 1.9.5/5.15.2(5.15.2)
> > Platform: Darwin 64
> > Installer: J903 install
> > InstallPath: /users/rauldmiller/applications/j903
> > Contact: www.jsoftware.com
> >
> > But I should be able to use the debugger on code wrapped in a try. 
> > statement.
> >
> > FYI,
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to