I changed the catch. to catchd. and it still caught the error. Debug was still on. Help implied that the catchd. block would not run at all if debug were on before the try./catch. block. Since one can test to see if debug was set in catch. , what is the purpose for catchd. ? What am I missing?
What I would really like is to put the try./catch. in the highest level of an application and it catch any error in the application. It seems awkward to have to put try./catch. in every subroutine to handle errors. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
