Ok, I'm thinking about updating that nuvoc entry now.

One question though, before I try tackling this issue:

Is it fair to say that a thread pool id of 0 has the same significance
as an omitted thread pool id? (If not, what thread pool id value would
represent an omitted thread pool id?)

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:46 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I will be very happy for you to improve the documentation as you like.
> We have no plans for other keywords, but you could imagine specifying a
> core# or the like.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 1/19/2023 11:41 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > That's a purpose, or at least a justification for its inclusion.
> >
> > But it still would need to be documented in nuvoc. Perhaps every
> > keyword should have a sentence (or table entry) describing the purpose
> > of its corresponding keyword value?
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to