Ah, thank you. I should have reviewed the nuvoc entry before asking that question.
Well... I've made some changes to the nuvoc entry, to state some of these issues more directly. Please let me know if you have issues with any of my editing here. (I've omitted mention of the "important parameters" abstraction -- but of course it can be brought back later, if future updates to t. warrant it.) Thanks, -- Raul On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:32 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. The entry says, > > By default, threadpool 0 is used. > > Henry Rich > > On 1/19/2023 12:30 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > Ok, I'm thinking about updating that nuvoc entry now. > > > > One question though, before I try tackling this issue: > > > > Is it fair to say that a thread pool id of 0 has the same significance > > as an omitted thread pool id? (If not, what thread pool id value would > > represent an omitted thread pool id?) > > > > Thanks, > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
