> From: R&S HUI
>
> I think f. itself was a bad idea so I would be reluctant to
> add F. .

Oh, so now there is "right" way to call parent's method from within child's
locale that contains method with the same name? What is it?

> In most cases, you can distinguish local from global names
> by processing the text of the definition.
All of the cases I wanted that adverb was not in a context of definition,
but in a context of a script.

>  In general you
> can not because of ". and the like.
Actually, in j6xx I can: I can store the value of a name, then assing to a
name globally, if there is domain error, name is local, if there is no
domain error, name is global and we need to restore its old value globally.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to