Harvey,

The red coloring of control words does not indicate an error. It's just the 
default highlighting for them. 

In your ijx or ijs window, select Edit/Configure, Category "Color", Item 
"Control Words". You can also experiment with the other predefined color 
schemes (for example, the "BlueJay" scheme uses beige for control words.

A little confusing, I must admit, if your customary editor (like MS Visual 
Basic's) turns things red to indicate errors.

And the dots are still needed on control words.

Christopher Lett  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of PackRat
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Jbeta] Undocumented language changes in 6.01?


I've been programming various versions of Microsoft BASIC since Altair 
days, over 30 years ago.  I'm very much a newbie when it comes to J, 
but its powerful vector/array handling makes me want to learn it for 
application to music and finance.  My question is this, concerning 
differences between the previous "standard" language as found in all 
the various books and learning tools and in the 601 version:  

The dropping of the dot from m, n, u, v, x and y is documented in the 
6.01 release highlights in the J online help.  However, the dropping of 
the dot from all control structures is NOT documented anywhere that I 
can find (maybe it exists, but I couldn't find it).  Is that a 
documentation oversight?  Are there any other significant (i.e., from a 
learning standpoint) undocumented changes from the previous "standard" 
J that newbies such as myself ought to know about?  Thanks!  

The current 6.01 beta online help shows terminal dots in the section on 
control structures, even though J6.01 won't accept them!  (They turn 
red when entered with dots.)  

Harvey


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to