bill lam wrote: > Chris Burke wrote: >> Given that u: 7: does what is needed to convert utf8 to unicode, it was >> thought unnecessary to provide another X u: to do this. Perhaps there >> should be another stdlib verb for it? > > I'm happy current 7&u: because emulating the current behavior had 7&u > implemented the other way round would be inefficient. > > But I would also favor adding another verb in addition to ucp=: 7&u: > say uucp (unicode ucp) > > uucp=: u:@:(7&u:)
Will do, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
