Yes. It doesn't have to be anything involved. Most of these scanners are automated so anything new should fool them
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, a challenge/response would work, but couldn't we geek it up a bit? > Say you send me a simple J expression like '3+4' and I have to respond with > the result of the "next" valid J expression, e.g. > > a.{~256|>:a. i. '3+4' > 4,5 > ".a.{~256|>:a. i. '3+4' > 4 5 > > ? > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:28:54 -0600 > > From: Don Guinn <[email protected]> > > > > Wouldn't it just be easier to add a simple response required from the > > client? It doesn't have to be elaborate like a full login with passwords > > etc. But that would stop pretty much stop the scanning for listening > ports. > > Maybe responding with the next letter in the alphabet. Silly, but should > be > > effective. > > ... > > > > > -- > Devon McCormick, CFA > ^me^ at acm. > org is my > preferred e-mail > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
