Ric,
you can try by patching file gtk.ijs 
search for the code

newsb=: 3 : 0
if. -.IFSV do. newtb y return. end.
'class scheme filename text'=. y
sb=. gtk_source_buffer_new 0
sm=. gtk_source_style_scheme_manager_get_default''
ss=. gtk_source_style_scheme_manager_get_scheme sm;scheme
gtk_source_buffer_set_style_scheme sb,ss
select. class
case. 'term' do.
case. 'edit' do.
  lm=. gtk_source_language_manager_get_default''

change the line 

case. 'term' do.

to

fcase. 'term' do.

and copying edit.xml to term.xml.  (untested)

I think it is hard to differentiate between input and output, but you
try and see if it worth to give users an option if they really like
it.


Чтв, 24 Июн 2010, Sherlock Ric писал(а):
> I find syntax highlighting really useful when composing sentences in
> the j602 IJX window. If it ends up being possible/acceptable to
> highlight the different parts of speech in the Term window, I
> imagine it will be even more useful for beginning J'ers as they come
> to grips with the different primitives.
> 
> If it ends up being possible to somehow differentiate the input and
> output and highlight them individually, then it would be a
> no-brainer. (It would obviously be configurable by the user in the
> same way the Edit window is now.)
> 
> If not then, as Raul & Dan point out, the current j602 jwdw IJX
> window highlights both input and output and the (not strictly
> correct) highlighted output is worth it to get the highlighted
> input. 
> 
> If we're not able to differentiate between the input and output,
> then scaling back the number of features differentiated in the Term
> window may help reduce confusion, this should be possible by just
> altering the term.xml file.
>  
> It is worth trying it out IMO.
> 
> [---=| TOFU protection by t-prot: 34 lines snipped |=---]

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to