On 29-Aug-05, at 9:12 PM, radish wrote:
well hunted. Perhaps file a bug report for this and let Dan decide what's the right thing to do.Anyway, if AsyncHTTP.pm could be modified to not include the port number when it's the default for the service (i.e. 80 for HTTP) then this would be fixed, and we'd still be RFC compliant.
-kdf _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
