On Sep 20, 2005, at 2:27 AM, greedy_grendel wrote:
Okay, yeah I'm streaming WMA Lossless. It's a shame there's no
support,
I was really looking forward to seeing what differences there may have
been.
There would only be two differences:
1. You'd use a little less CPU power to play back, since you'd be
dropping the WMA decode and FLAC encode.
2. Fast forward and reverse scanning would work.
Overall network usage would be about the same.
Unfortunately, our WMA license doesn't include Lossless, it's a lot
more money per player shipped and the benefit is modest.
-dean
_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
