mavit;242001 Wrote: > This doesn't sound like a good approach to me. You're bundling flac > 1.1.1, presumably without the security fixes included in 'flac 1.2.1' > (http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html#flac_1_2_1). Even if you > include flac 1.2.1, we can't expect you to respond to any future > problems as quickly as the distribution vendor.
The problem I needed to fix is that CentOS 4 includes a version of flac that is *older* than 1.1.1 and is incompatible with alienbbc. Although it's not the cleanest way to build an RPM, my thinking is that the lowest risk (from a compatibility and support standpoint) is just to package whatever is in the standard SC tarball. If there is a reason to update it, the core SD developers will do so and the RPM will pick it up then. -- Fletch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fletch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39789 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
