release number is guaranteed to go up and in the case that we push out new updated nightlies it will automatically get updated.
The basic format that makes sense to me is: <product>-<branch/version>-<svn revision> On Dec 20, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Fletch wrote: > > dean blackketter;250402 Wrote: >> What about using the SVN revision number? >> >> squeezecenter-7.0-r3456 > > Either date or svn rev number work for pre-releases. I don't think > there's any real advantage to either. It's probably best that the > RPM, > deb and tarball all do it the same way. Either way, the need for the > leading 0.1 is still there. Your example is a case where the > increment > might be needed: > > squeezecenter-7.0-0.1.r3466 => > squeezecenter-7.0-0.2.beta1 => > squeezecenter-7.0-1 > > > -- > Fletch > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Fletch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529 > View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41217 > > _______________________________________________ > beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
