Fletch;250486 Wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for listening to my advice on naming and numbering - I feel > pretty strongly that this is the right way to go. I have disabled my > yum build script. > > I took a quick look at your patch and one thing jumps out. I added > those macros for version, sourcefile, etc so that the RPM could be > built without having to patch the spec. I always thought that was kind > of a kluge. I'll take a look tomorrow and see if I can offer an > alternate patch. > > Has a final decision been made on 7.0 vs. 7.0.0? There was some > discussion in bug 6258 but I wasn't sure what the final decision was. > As I mentioned over there, I think the RPM will be fine either way.
No final decision has been made, but for the purposes of keeping the Yum repo working, we had to do 7.0.0. For some reason when I did 7.0, it would always use the latest file with the 7.0.0 name and ignore the 7.0 files. PS, the yum repo didn't update automatically this morning, so I did it manually. I had a small bug that kept the script from running properly. It should be good going forward. The parsing of the spec file may be a bit of a kludge, but I didn't want to get rid of it completely ... it might be that we need to move away from the makerelease.pl script completely, but we don't need to make that decision yet. I'm working on a whole new build architecture here, and when that gets more flushed out, the scripts will likely change quite a bit. -- Diranged ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Diranged's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13773 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41217 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
