I think we shouldn't be checking in the nightly builds, rather only  
the source that creates them.


On Dec 26, 2007, at 1:36 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: mwise
>> Date: Wed Dec 26 01:05:36 2007
>> New Revision: 15591
>>
>> URL: http://svn.slimdevices.com?rev=15591&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Adding Daily Builds on 20071226
>>
>> Added:
>>     vendor/yum/squeezecenter-testing/ 
>> squeezecenter-7.0.0-0.1.20071226.noarch.rpm   (with props)
>> Modified:
>>     vendor/yum/squeezecenter-testing/repodata/filelists.xml.gz
>>     vendor/yum/squeezecenter-testing/repodata/other.xml.gz
>>     vendor/yum/squeezecenter-testing/repodata/primary.xml.gz
>>     vendor/yum/squeezecenter-testing/repodata/repomd.xml
>
>
> I notice that there have been three builds of the RPM without any  
> changes.
>
> Can I suggest that new RPMs shouldn't be built unless there have been
> any changes?
>
> R.
>
> _______________________________________________
> beta mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta

_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta

Reply via email to