a trip down memory lane it is then... snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > > MrSinatra Wrote: > > perhaps you're talking to me about the obscenity laced PM you sent me, > > which i still have, that i ignored and didn't report you for... oh wait, > > that kinda defeats your point.> > Obscenity laced?
did i spell it wrong or something? yeah, obscenity laced. you do know what an obscenity is, don't you? snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > You mean the one that said "You need to get laid?" i see you don't know what an obscenity is. no, i mean the one that went on for a page calling me dozens of names like "assholish" and "pain in the ass" and so on... you see, THOSE are obscenities. and while not obscene, saying "Personally, I don't care if you live or die" and "I still won't give a rat's fuzzy behind if you live or die," -in the same PM mind you,- is the kind of thing that when i read it, brings this to mind: > Thanks for always being a pleasure to read: I am sure you are just as > cheerful and friendly in real life and that people take you just as > seriously there as they do here. couldn't agree more! ;) anyway, i ignored your PM and let it drop, defeating your previous premise in this thread btw. snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > As you may recall, -you- posted that. I quoted you. indeed, and now lets provide the context. here is the thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45457 starting at post 41, for some reason, you started to get all condescending towards slimkid, "Note the lack of spaces. Note the caps." and then, in post 42, you accuse me of overstating, again in a mary poppin's schoolmarm-ish way. i said "SEEMS to affect" but you ignore that and "correct" me unnecessarily anyway. fine, so be it. now, maybe you or others see no problem with 41 and 42, but any reasonable reader would see that in post 45, you go off the deep end unprovoked, and get condescending and sarcastic without due or just cause, in almost EVERY sentence, including out of place analogies about idiots and morons and boogers. in post 45 you lose ALL decorum for no reason, you weren't provoked, but that doesn't stop you. you just start being exceedingly and unnecessarily sarcastic and beyond rude. that you have the gall and chutzpah to accuse me of "starting it" when the evidence is there clearly in that thread for any and all to see, just goes to show your own lack of self awareness. you continue in post 46, now adding attacks on my motives and intentions, which is unquestionably a PERSONAL attack, and accuse me of "deliberately twisting your words" which "pushed you over the edge." sorry, but that was and remains, *crazy talk.* ONLY AT THAT POINT, after all those rude, unprovoked attacks by you, did i call you on it, and i intially did so accurately, not personally. i didn't say ANYTHING previously that warranted you to react like that in ANY of those posts. and if the mod were going to step in, its at post 45 and 46 they should have. but unlike you, i didn't run to mommy to tattle. also, for you to be offended that i ACCURATELY pointed out over and over again that you only HALF quote facts, just goes to show your skewed non-sensical POV. don't forget, i won this argument, 8001 resulted from arguments like the one i made in that thread, your POV lost. and i would never say that that way, except you seem to not know it, and don't acknowledge ANY point i made in it. snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > If you think that sort of line isn't offensive when you say it, yet it > is when it is quoted back as: ---Quote---and where precisely did I tell > you to 'go get laid'? Or anything even close to that?---End Quote---Feel > free to complain about that PM: i let your goofy tirade roll right off my back, i have a capacity for that which you lack utterly. and quoting me back isn't what i was complaining about, obviously. snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > it's hardly "obscenity laced" its certainly worse, and more obscene, than anything i ever said. snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > and considering it was a private response to a public and blatantly > offensive post, I think it's very polite. indeed, you're a regular miss manners! snarlydwarf;428484 Wrote: > http://forums.slimdevices.com/private.php?do=showpm&pmid=18012 if one of > the admins with privs wants to see it. (I would show you the post where > you said that to me, but, well, admins long ago deleted that part of > it.) and that was ridiculous, but allow me to provide the context, as you seem to have conveinently forgotten it... in my final post of that thread, in the part that was ridiculously censored, i tried to explain to you that NOTHING i had said or done prior to your first unquestionably rude posts (45 and 46) was in any way a PERSONAL attack, or disingenuous, or rude, or paternal, or anything of the sort. whats so crazy is that YOU made and started the personal attacks, and yet you were accusing me of doing so when all i was doing up was trying to state my case for 8001, which eventually won out. to the best of my recollection, the censored part was ~ "IF you want to know what a personal attack is, 'Go get laid' now THATS a personal attack" which i said b/c you did not seem capable of comprending the difference between a personal attack, and me challenging your assertions about SC (which is all i wanted to do until you started attacking me). it was meant to illustrate it for you, to educate you, so you could see the difference, b/c clearly, your perception needs some fine tuning. if anyone has it in their email, feel free to post it. and yeah, it was meant to bother you too, which frankly you had earned in spades by that late point in the thread, with your rudeness and so on that YOU started. but to act like it was the crime of the century, is so juvenile by you, as to be laughable, and to act as if it was obscene, is also laughable. sure, it was meant to LIGHTLY bother you, but it was ALSO meant to be so juvenile and frankly humorous and also put into educative context so no one would take it SERIOUSLY, including you! ...which again, you laughably did! i still can't believe that offended you, and it says a lot about you. frankly, i think its funny that it still seems to be a problem for you. get over it, (or try craigslist). ps. loving this ALBUM ARTIST topic; way to not divert the thread guys, keep it personal, great way to avoid arguments challenging SC's paradigm. -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57922 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
