Nonreality;432668 Wrote: > Just wondering why the change and just what is the reasoning for going > with the new database. Just from reading people's responses to it, it > makes me wonder why the change. Is is monetary, speed or ease of use? > From my reading it doesn't seem to fit anything other than possibly > monetary. From my use it's about the same speed maybe just a bit slower > but not enough to matter. It just seems to be more problems than with > the other. I'm just curious about it as it's been working ok so far for > me. I've had a couple of problems but nothing that I wouldn't expect > from a beta. Mainly just curious about the change and what was expected > to improve or was it just a cheaper way to go?
Cheaper, how? The biggest thing is probably easier deployment. Less dealing with firewalls and installing and managing another Windows service. It's also a quick and dirty way of implementing multiple libraries, with each library occupying a separate database. Most of the problems right now are with the new scanning code, which is mostly independent of the underlying database. -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64564 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
