Phil Leigh;532889 Wrote: > Well yes but two wrongs don't make a right! The tags are silly - > commercial or not. Not having a track artist just makes no sense at > all. > Passionato.com need to be told...
Right now this error is an unhandled exception and also needs to be fixed on the SBS end of things, either by having the scanner reject such files (so the use gets feedback and can fix the tags) or by assuming the album artist applies to the track by inheritance in the absence of actual artist tags. For info 7.5 doesn't exhibit any problems with such tracks. So this behavior will be seen as a regression by some users. Finally, this bug has a striking similarity to 15553 that was fixed for the 7.5 release. The discussion went like this: Michael Wrote: > Andy - what's particular about this track is that there's a composer, > but no artist in the tags. It does indeed not show up in SP, while it > does in the web UI. But if I remove the composer, it would be on SP > too, under the "No Artist" group. Andy Wrote: > > OK so what I think we should do in this case is use the composer value > as the > artist, if there is no artist tag. wolfgang Wrote: > IMO it should be in the "No artist" group. > > Just my 2 cents The latter opinion finally prevailed. A highly analogous situation, don't you agree? I for one will complain to Passionato. I'd really like for someone to look at it on the SBS side as well, though, -- dsdreamer ---------------------- "Dreamer, easy in the chair that really fits you..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dsdreamer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12588 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76785 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
