I reduced the buffer size to 20MB, restarted LMS and did a full scan. Not knowing quite how all this works, I then wondered if there might be relevant data held in memory even when LMS is stopped, so I rebooted and repeated.
To be be brief I have not detected much difference in scan times with changes in buffer size or with/without the extra indices. Custom Scan is a few minutes quicker with a larger buffer, but it varies by several minutes each time anyway. The LMS scan varies by a minute or so. By far the biggest improvement for me in scanning has been due to the vacuuming. I believe my Custom Scan scans are much quicker because they now start with a vacuumed library.db. Similarly the improvement in menu responsiveness is, as far as I can tell, mostly down to vacuuming. I'll try a test later without vacuuming. LMS 7.9 on VortexBox Midi running Xubuntu 14.04, FLACs 16->24 bit, 44.1->192kbps. Wired Touch + EDO, coax to Musical Fidelity M1 CLiC. Wireless Xubuntu 14.04 laptop controls LMS via Chromium. Meridian Explorer USB DAC to listen via Squeezelite on Vortexbox & other PCs as required. Spare Touch in loft. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PasTim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41642 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101469 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
