Wolfgang Fähnle wrote: > The most people wait for 2.5, like me. > Alpha, beta, stable and then think about 2.6. > I like 2.49b, otherwise you could change to Blender 2010 like others do. >
The naming convention based on a yearly release is not a bad idea either. One immediately knows the age of the version. One cannot say the same with the current versioning at the moment. 2.40, 2.41, 2.42 all came out within a very small time-frame compared to 2.48, 2.49, & 2.50. It's not something I'm hung up on, but a good idea worth highlighting. -- Regards, Benjamin Tolputt Analyst Programmer _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
