I agree with Matt. Well said! On 4/27/10, Matt Ebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Brecht Van Lommel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Personally I think we should try to move to a system where you >>> basically say, "texture this property", and then that property gets a >>> texture or texture stack attached. >> >> I completely agree this is where we need to be heading, with the focus >> on finding and editing the individual textures themselves, rather than >> trying to find them implicitly and indirectly via their 'parent' data. > > One other thing I also forgot to mention that this would also be much > more suitable for using external renderers, many of which do indeed > work via attaching textures directly to properties, which Blender's > current system is very poorly equipped to deal with. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers >
-- Sent from my mobile device >From Luke _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
