2010/11/8 Gustav Göransson <[email protected]> > > Can't it be both? > > I can't speak for anyone, but myself so its really just my opinion.
But I think it is wiser to be one or the other, and I'll tell you why. Blogs are picked up by aggregators, but aggregators do not pick up other aggregators. This is why Blendernation and Plantblender do not aggregate each other, it would just be total duplication, every interesting post would show up at least twice on each site, maybe more, this would be very annoying for everyone. So if code.blender.org starts to aggregate content which is already being aggregated by Blendernation and Planetblender then I do not think that those sites would pick up code.blender.org, and also I think that people who are already subscribed to those two aggregators will not see much benefit to subscribing to a third aggregator. So on the other hand, if code.blender.org keeps its content unique (not hosting content already published on other blogs which are already being aggregated by other portals) then people will subscribe to code.blender.org for its own sake, and it will likely be picked up by both Blendernation and Planetblender thus spreading it's reach to a much broader audience than it could do on its own. Just my opinion, I dont speak for anyone involved in any of these sites. _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
